« Well, Yes Bob | Main | Galbraith and Friedman »

December 01, 2006

Ya Gotta Love WalMart!

Carpe Diem:

One study, by the economic consulting firm Global Insight, calculates that Wal-Mart saves American households an average of $2,300 a year through lower prices, or a $263 billion reduction in the cost of living. That compares with $33 billion savings for low-income families from the federal food stamp program.

...

Carrefour's new CEO, 42-year-old José Luis Duran, is trying to whip the retailer into shape. Since taking over in February 2005, he's slashed prices in Carrefour's core French market to combat the rise of discounting rivals. He hopes to make the company quicker and nimbler.
Carrefour faces a bigger threat than ever from Wal-Mart, which is pushing overseas as its growth slows down in the U.S. Wal-Mart has a greater presence in North America and Latin America, while Carrefour operates in more European and Asian countries. But they face off in three of the world's biggest markets: China, Brazil and Argentina.
Bottom Line: Wal-Mart saves consumers billions of dollars annually all over the world who shop AT Wal-Mart, and the intense competitive pressure FROM Wal-Mart, saves consumers billions of dollars annually all over the world who shop AT non-Wal-Mart stores like Target, Carrefour, K-Mart, etc. So even those consumers who might hate Wal-Mart and shop at Target or other discount retailers, STILL benefit from Wal-Mart, because without Wal-Mart, Target's prices would be HIGHER.

What's not to like?

December 1, 2006 in Economics | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d3e53ef00d83500152d69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ya Gotta Love WalMart!:

Comments

Of course, if they paid their workers more then those workers would have more to spend. So surely it's a little bit of a circle?

Tim adds: Yes, and all of the shoppers at WalMart would have to pay more to buy the goods at WalMart. Who are we trying to organise society for? The producer or the consumer?

Posted by: sanbikinoriaon | Dec 1, 2006 1:30:25 PM

> Who are we trying to organise society for? The producer or the consumer?

Just a note there are allways more consumers than producers (as everyone is a consumer) so organising for producers at the expense of consumers will allways make a country poorer.

Posted by: AntiCitizenOne | Dec 1, 2006 2:00:10 PM

"Who are we trying to organise society for? The producer or the consumer?"

q.v. Health Service, UK National

Posted by: David Gillies | Dec 1, 2006 3:55:22 PM

What's not to like?

The atrociously poor quality of the products and the atrociously poor quality of the service.

Posted by: Kim | Dec 1, 2006 5:49:53 PM