« Quick Question. | Main | John Tierney: That First Thanksgiving. »

November 22, 2005

Nicholas Kristof: Sudan‘s Department of Gang Rape.

Nicholas Kristoff makes a damn good point. Why aren’t we doing something?

tag



When the Arab men in military uniforms caught Noura Moussa and raped her the other day, they took the trouble to explain themselves.

''We cannot let black people live in this land,'' she remembers them telling her, and they used racial epithets against blacks, called her a slave, and added: ''We can kill any members of African tribes.''

Ms. Noura is one of thousands of women and girls to be gang-raped in Darfur, as part of what appears to be a deliberate Sudanese government policy to break the spirit of several African tribes through mass rape.

This policy is shrewd as well as brutal, for the exceptional stigma of rape here often silences victims even as it terrorizes the entire population and forces people to flee.

Ms. Noura, 22, expected to be married soon, and the neighbors said she probably would have received a bride price of 30 cows. These days, they say, she will be lucky to find any husband at all -- and will not get a single cow.

This is the first genocide of the 21st century, and we are collectively letting the Sudanese government get away with it. Sudan's leaders appear to have made a calculated decision that some African tribes in the Darfur region are more of a headache than the international protests that result when it depopulates large areas of those tribes. In effect, it is our acquiescence that allows the rapes and murders to continue.

The solution isn't to send American troops. But a starting point is to convey American outrage -- loudly and insistently -- and demonstrate that Darfur is an American priority.

Ms. Noura's saga began when the Sudanese Army and janjaweed militia burned down her village a year ago and killed her father. She and her family fled here to Kalma, but she is the eldest child and needed money to support her younger brothers and sisters.

So she ventured out of Kalma to cut grass in the nearby fields to sell. That was when the men raped and beat her, leaving her unable to walk home. (You can see video of Ms. Noura in ''The Forgotten Genocide,'' at www.nytimes.com/kristof.)

Rape leads to particular injuries in Darfur because many girls, as part of female circumcision rites, have their vaginas sewn shut with a wild thorn. The resulting physical trauma from rape also increases the risk of H.I.V. transmission. In addition, the attackers sometimes rape women with sticks or bayonets, causing internal injuries that leave the victims incontinent.

Sudan has backed off a bit in response to protests about the rapes, and it has stopped arresting women who go to foreign aid workers to seek medical treatment. But the rapes themselves are continuing, unabated. The Sudanese police and military are everywhere in the area, but they don't secure the fields outside the camp where the attacks take place.

In just one of eight sectors in Kalma, I found three women who acknowledged on the record that they had been gang-raped this month within a few days of each other.

Arifa Muhammad, 25, told of being caught by 10 men as she planted okra to have a little more food for her three children. One of the men said, ''I know you are Zaghawa, so we will rape you.'' Afterward, they beat her with the butts of their guns.

The very next day, Saida Abdukarim, also 25, was tending her vegetables when three men with guns seized her. She pleaded with them, pointing out that she is eight months' pregnant.

''They said, 'You are black, and so we can rape you,' '' she recalled. Then they gang-raped her and beat her with sticks and their guns. She absorbed the beating, trying to protect her unborn baby, and although she was too battered to walk, she has so far not miscarried.

To me, Ms. Noura, Ms. Arifa and Ms. Saida are among the heroes of Darfur. There is no shame in being raped, but plenty of stigma should attach to those who ignore crimes against humanity. In my book, it's the politicians who don't consider genocide a priority who aren't worth a single cow.

These three women have the backbone to stand up and be counted. We in the West have so much less to lose, yet we can't even find our own voices. Let's hope that the courage of these three women may inspire President Bush, Kofi Annan and other world leaders finally to show a little more backbone and stand much more firmly against genocide.

November 22, 2005 in Politics | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d3e53ef00d8349714cc69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nicholas Kristof: Sudan‘s Department of Gang Rape.:

Comments

I've been railing about this for so long without so much as a comment that I've given up.

I've been told I'm being naive and the answer to your question, which is also mine, is OIL.

Again.

Posted by: auntymarianne | Nov 22, 2005 6:47:14 PM

Sudan has oil.

Oil or no oil, there's nothing the West can do that won't set the usual suspects howling and bellowing about war crimes, imperialism, international legitimacy, the Jews, etc. Ten years ago, they were bellowing about how we didn't care about the Kurds because the Kurds had no oil (they did have oil, actually). Now we do care about the Kurds and they're condemning us for that, instead.

Mewling about the ICC doesn't qualify as doing anything, by the way.

So, are you demanding meaningless hot air? If so, you can accomplish as much by talking as Kofi Annan can, so go for it. Have fun.

Or are you demanding actual intervention? That's called a "war". People get killed, some of them innocent. That's how it works.

Or are you demanding that the Good Fairy make everything nice and make Grandma alive again?

Tim adds: Well, I would be demanding armed intervention.

Posted by: P. Froward | Nov 22, 2005 7:38:44 PM

...because unfortunatly nobody gives a damn about africa. Earlier in the year the army in sudan requested more un assistence to increase their number in order to police the vast region. It was not given, yet so much emphasis is place upon Iraq when it is not wanted!

Posted by: jamal | Nov 23, 2005 12:13:59 AM

I'm with P Froward here. "Outrage" is pointless hot air. There's been enough of that already and it's been demonstrated as being pointless particularly when it is undermined by the self same "outraged" nations. Want an example? The world tells Country X it's a very naughty country and should be ashamed of itself for abusing its people. It then gives the same bloody country a seat on the UN Council for Human Rights!

It is becomeing more and more clear that the sorts of leaders who permit/encourage this kind of activity listen to one thing only: Big nasty marines (Royal or US) armed with big nasty guns coming to take away their toys and deliver a much needed spanking.

Until the whining classes accept this fact and agree to reform of the global order they are going to have to live with one of two cases: Either the world carries on as before and people suffer or some western countries are going to take "unilateral" action.

Unfortunately, any logical reform would mean the same whingers would have to admit that their fixation with moral equivalence was garbage so I don't see any change in the near future.

RM

Posted by: Remittance Man | Nov 23, 2005 10:06:36 AM