June 16, 2009
Miley Cyrus BJ
Yes, there's a photo out there of Miley Cyrus doing a BJ. Or at least, there's a photo out there that purports to show a Miley Cyrus BJ.
The truth about the Miley Cyrus BJ photo is rather more prosaic:
No, it isn't Miley Cyrus in the photo:
And a good thing too, for Miley Cyrus is under age: that means that not only isn't she doing such things, even if she were, having a photo of her doing so would put you in jail.
Apparently it's quite a good fake but a fake it is:
And on the subject of the Miley Cyrus BJ image and her age:
The internet is flooded with people searching "Miley Cyrus BJ photos" and "Miley Cyrus leaked photos". People are hoping to see a photo of Miley, who is only 16, performing oral sex. Many people searching for the Miley picture may also be under 18, but many are probably older than 18. To those that are over 18 please remember Miley Cyrus is a 16 year old little girl. Looking at a picture of a minor performing sexual acts is considered child pornography.
And as to the faking of the image you can see how it was done here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Miley Cyrus BJ:
The Inquisitr link does not show that the miley pic is fake, this blogger is just a moron who didn't understand the picture he was looking at which he took from another website.
The picture set he posted was actually meant to be showing that the Miley picture was real, but Inquisitr was too dumb to figure that out.
Congrats on linking to and repeating his stupidity.
Posted by: no | Jun 16, 2009 4:46:54 PM
Anyone who reads this article please understand that everything you are being told about the "proof of doctoring" is just a misinterpretation of evidence that confirms that the bj pic is Miley Cyrus. I should know, I've been scouring the underbelly of the Internet on and off for much of the day.
Posted by: RMieke | Jun 17, 2009 12:25:54 AM
The photo is real.
1) EXIF data:
Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000
Flash: No flash function
Focus: At 0mm
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%
2) Picture taken at that very night on Miley’s Twitter, with EXIF date proving it - http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg. Shows her with the same rosy cheeks and the same hairstyle.
3) The combination diagram, which the Inquisitr, Paparrazzis, and other websites took as evidence for it being a photoshop, was in fact created by a digg.com user to prove that it is real. Her head’s position is a little different than in those two photos, something that cannot be done in photoshop.
4) The original photo had TrainReq’s watermark. Sound familiar? Same guy who leaked all the other Miley photos from her e-mail account.
I’m sick and tired of misinformation being spread around. Tabloid websites should hire people who actually do research, and not just jump to conclusions.
Posted by: Michael | Jun 17, 2009 9:02:54 PM
It's fake. Someone went to great lengths to make it seem real, hacked EXIF data and all. But they overlooked one simple thing.
The date on the EXIF data is April 9, 2009 at 1:54 PM. Miley was in Nashville promoting her movie, and while there she sent this update at 1:54 PM: http://twitter.com/mileycyrus/status/1485299626
(If you see a different time, bear in mind that Twitter automatically converts updates to the time zones that you are in.)
So, unless Miley was twittering while doing the deed, which is incredibly unlikely... the times do not match up.
My guess? The hacker was on Pacific Time and saw that at 1:15 (which was actually 3:15 in Nashville) Miley went out with Mitchel - see Michael's linked pic - and said hacker saw an opportunity and went from there. The doctored photo includes a necklace that *looks* like Mitchel's but actually is not.
Is all this "proof" a little far-fetched? Somewhat. However, bear in mind that there are some people who really hate this girl and will go to great lengths to bring her down, including an elaborate photo hoax. Others have said the same thing: that whoever modified the photo is very skilled with photoshop, but at the end of the day, it's still fake.
Just something I noticed when I went back to look at the pic Michael mentioned.
Posted by: Jeff | Jun 18, 2009 7:46:07 AM
I'm sorry, by "hacker" I meant "photo editor". Slip of the tongue ... I mean keyboard.
Posted by: Jeff | Jun 18, 2009 7:54:35 AM
So where is blow job? I want to see it. Its fake.
Posted by: Hector | Nov 13, 2009 1:40:21 PM