« Graetzel cells | Main | Lauren Laverne is Pregnant »

August 09, 2007

Seumas Milne

This piece:

In other words, the price of staying in Iraq will have to rise still further if the US is going to be forced out and Iraq regain its independence.Inside Iraq, that price can only be exacted by increased resistance.
...
The history of anti-colonial and anti-occupation resistance campaigns shows that success has almost always depended on broad-based national movements. But the embryonic resistance front has got to be a positive development if it holds together.


I dunno, I'm really rather confused here. Yes, of course I support free speech, however, it does strike meas slightly odd for Milne to point out that British soldiers are being killed, in "payment of Tony Blair's blood-price for the special relationship" and then for him to go on and advise those doing the killing how to do more of it.

If we accept (as Milne certainly would) that we're actually at war here: this isn't a police action or anything, then, umm, don't we have phrases to describe those who proffer advice and encouragement to the enemy? Aiding and Abetting perhaps?

Even if, as again I'm sure Milne would say, this is an illegal war and he's doing the right thing to draw attention to its futility, to the crimes committed by those at the top, even so, this "Inside Iraq, that price can only be exacted by increased resistance." repulses me. I read it as "They should kill more Brits" but perhaps I'm being over sensitive.

August 9, 2007 in Military | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d3e53ef00e3933886068834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Seumas Milne:

Comments

I don't think you are too sensitive at all, it is a repulsive piece by a person with despicable morals and a great yellow streak down his back. If he hates americans that much and admires the sort who wantonly slaughter women and children in Iraq in the name of "resistance", why doesn't he head to the US himself and try taking out a few of them personally. Not that he would ever have the courage of his monstrous convictions mind you.

Posted by: Ed Snack | Aug 9, 2007 9:59:00 AM

I don't think you're being over sensitive either. To describe beheaders and suicide bombers as 'resistance' is repugnant if you ask me.

See also Iraqi interpreters being described as 'collaborators'.

Posted by: Justin | Aug 9, 2007 10:13:12 AM

Rather unusually, I agree with Tim but disagree with Justin.

Milne is wrong to call for more attacks on our troops, even though he's right about the utter folly of us being there.

But Justin is wrong to suggest that the people who kill our soldiers (note: not the people who kill women and children) can't be classed as a resistance, given that we're an unwanted occupying army.

More on my blog.

Posted by: PDF | Aug 9, 2007 1:21:41 PM

Fisked in its entirety here http://www.di2.nu/200708/09a.htm

Posted by: Francis | Aug 9, 2007 4:25:47 PM

Post a comment