« The EU and Abortion. | Main | Economic Freedom Index. »
January 05, 2006
Brazilian Beef and Slavery.
So some Brazilian beef might be produced using slaves. To be honest, wouldn’t surprise me. It is worth noting that actually, whatever is happening in the Amazon, most of the beef comes from the southern states:
Alberto Fonseca, the commercial councillor at the Brazilian embassy in London, said it was impossible to say that beef from forest areas cleared with slave labour was not coming to Britain. However, most of the beef that was exported was of the highest quality and came from Sao Paulo state, land that was cleared in the 17th and 18th centuries.
What worried me a little about the compilers of the report is that they don’t seem to understand costs very well:
Cost to produce per kilo: £1.02, includes 90p production plus 12p transport to Europe
(Source: English Beef and Lamb Executive)
Costs include:
• No winter maintenance
• Labour costs
• No vet or medicine bills (paid by government)
• No transport to slaughterhouse (paid by abattoirs)
• Land often unfenced
• Land often not fertilised
• Transport costs (12.5p per kilo)
OK, the vets bills are a subsidy. The maintenance and fertilizer things are pure comparative advantage. But if the abattoirs are paying some of the transport bills, do they really think this makes the beef cheaper? It’s still a cost paid in the supply chain, whether it’s paid by the farmers or the slaughterhouse doesn’t make any difference to the price as it leaves the country or as it arrives in Europe.
Puerly by coincidence I’ve been reading Darwin’s Voyage of the Beagle the past couple of days. Much of the first half is about his travels on the pampas of Uruguay and Argentina, and the southern states of Brazil are very similar. It’s perfect cattle country. It’s exactly the sort of place we should be getting our beef from (absent the slave labour, of course). If, as the figures above show, production and shipping costs are 1.02 a kilo while UK beef (as they claim) is 2.50, assuming again the absence of slave labour, of which no one is claiming there is any in those southern states, then what we should be doing is importing exactly that cheaper beef. We’re making both ourselves and the Brazilians poorer by not doing so.
January 5, 2006 in Food and Drink | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d3e53ef00d8346945c453ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brazilian Beef and Slavery.:
Comments
damn right. tastes nicer too.
Posted by: Paul Davies | Jan 5, 2006 10:58:07 AM
I am sure that with its lower labour costs, cheaper farm costs etc. Brazil is a very competitive beef producer, but aren't the eu and British governments at least partly to blame for the massive cost disparity?
I'd be very surprised if the Brazilian producers are saddled with the costs of all the regulation that British farmers and food processors bear.
Just as an idle, example question - do Brazilian abatoirs have fully qualified vets on duty all the time?
RM
Posted by: The Remittance Man | Jan 5, 2006 11:33:58 AM
I don’t suppose that the use of slave labour might be in any way connected to the blissful lack of regulation?
Oh my, the wicked, wicked EU.
Tim adds: I think you’ll find that Brazil has lots of labour regulation. Not very effectively applied though.
Posted by: Brian Hughes | Jan 5, 2006 12:36:33 PM
Brian
I was refering to the southern pampas regions of Brazil cited in the article above as the source of most Brazilian beef sold in Britain. I have never had the pleasure of visiting South America, but from the odd Discovery Channel documentary I have managed to glean the impression that cows raised on vast open grasslands need to be tended by mounted herdsmen. The Argentines refer to these chaps as gauchos.
To my mind no slave owner wishing to keep hold of his slaves would provide his property (the slave) with yet more of his property (a horse) on the grounds that said horse would facilitate the flight of the slave. Therefore I draw the logical conclusion that if the bulk of the beef sold to Britain comes from gaucho tended cows, it is unlikely to be tainted by the evil of slavery.
I think it would be fair to say that even legitimate labour costs in Brazil are lower than in western europe. I think it is also fair to assume that on lush grassland, cow maintenance costs are low. This gives the Brazilian Beef Barons and economic advantage which they appear to be using.
I was merely pondering whether in their well meaning efforts to support the european farmer and protect workers and consumers, the various governments in europe had not added to the Brazilians' advantage.
I hope this clears things up.
The Remittance Man
Posted by: The Remittance Man | Jan 5, 2006 2:26:48 PM
"well meaning efforts to support the european farmer and protect workers and consumers": careful, the sarcasm is getting a little vitriolic here.
Posted by: dearieme | Jan 6, 2006 5:01:04 AM
Sarcasm? Moi?!
I'm wounded, Dearie, wounded to the core.
RM
Posted by: The Remittance Man | Jan 6, 2006 6:16:26 AM
