« Message to Vicki Woods. | Main | Don’t These People Have Editors ? Part XXV. »
May 13, 2005
The Aquatic Ape Theory.
Further evidence for the aquatic ape theory:
Early modern humans in East Africa initially survived on an inland diet based on big game but by 70,000 years ago, archaeological finds suggest their diet had changed to a coastal one consisting largely of shellfish.
However, climate change seems likely to have reduced the Red Sea's shellfish stocks, driving them to seek better fishing grounds.
Now I’m not a biologist by any means, but I’ve always been intruiged by the various bits and bobs of evidence that show how, at some point along the line, humans and seashores interacted. The pattern of hair on our bodies, the way new born babies can swim, these sorts of things. I certainly don’t claim that this news proves any of it, just find it interesting, that’s all.
The international project shows - contrary to previous thinking - that early modern humans spread across the Red Sea from the Horn of Africa, along the tropical coast of the Indian Ocean towards the Pacific in just a few thousand years.
This also ties in with something Jared Diamond said in Guns Germs and Steel, that the Clovis people could have reached Chile/Patagonia only 1,000 years after crossing the Bering Strait (at that time a land bridge). It’s only a few miles a year of movement, nothing exceptional for hunter gatherers. It might also have implications for Kenneth Windschuttle’s (spelling?) work on Negritos as well. Be fun to see how the research all pans out.
Anyone who has further links to this sort of stuff, please do leave them in the comments.
May 13, 2005 in History | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2d3e53ef00d83458fa1e69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Aquatic Ape Theory.:
» Aquatic Apes from voluntaryXchange
Tim Worstall gives us the latest on a theory I've been fond of for about 15 years (and which was just about impossible to find discussed prior to the advent of the internet). Namely, that humans differ from other great [Read More]
Tracked on May 19, 2005 9:46:07 AM
Comments
I'm also a believer in the "Aquatic Ape" theory. There's an enormous amount of evidence in its favour, everything from upright posture (wading through rivers), through to the patterns and even types (white or brown) of fat deposits that all point to an aquatic lifestyle.
Posted by: David Wildgoose | May 13, 2005 11:00:22 AM
"However, climate change seems likely to have reduced the Red Sea's..."
Surely they could have spread further, faster? Climate change without SUVs? I don't BELIEVE it.
Posted by: Rob Read | May 13, 2005 11:56:05 AM
Aquatic-ape-wise: why do some varieties of European males have hairy backs when others don't? Seems much more variable than chest hair.
Posted by: dearieme | May 13, 2005 3:15:33 PM
As far as movement goes, it's a lot easier to walk along the flat pan of the seashore in many places, than to trudge through a thick and spikey jungle.
Along the shore you have a sandy zone of visibility that enables you to see and keep a distance from predators, whereas in the jungle underbrush they can hide much better than an upright bumbling hominid.
Along the shore are crabs and shellfish, coconut palms drop fresh fruit, rivers of fresh water run down to it, and maybe you catch a bird or two as you amble along in company to a new destination.
And the very powerful tug of human curiosity could also propel them onward; what's around the next headland??
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view | May 13, 2005 5:37:59 PM
Sorry, but that article has nothing to do with the aquatic ape hypothesis (not a theory yet).
'Aquatic Ape' is about how there was a semi aquatic stage in the process leading to the development of modern humans. The article in the Telegraph is explicitly about changes in feeding and migratory patterns after our fully human ancestors appeared.
Try here, although it refers to both the AAT (wrong) and the AAH (correct) -
http://www.riverapes.com/AAH/FoF/FactOrFiction.htm
Posted by: Chris Harper | May 14, 2005 5:49:47 AM
or try here for the lowdown on the theory's accuracy:
http://www.aquaticape.org
Posted by: anthrosciguy | May 15, 2005 4:59:03 AM
I nor agree or disagree with the AAT (Theory). However there is simple insufficiant evidence to support the theory, i.e.- No fossils. All "evidence" given for he theory is simply hypothetical and not backed sufficiently by scientific evidence as opose to AAH.
Posted by: Ashton Szuster | Aug 9, 2005 1:41:22 PM
How much evidence is needed to turn a theory into fact?
The only reliable evidence we have is ourselves!
What we are and the way we behave can easily be explained with an aquatic theory that involves a global scene.
Thus we must have been able to spead world wide before re-entering the land.
The evolution of language, involving universal concept forming and sentence building yet arbitrary vocalisation!
The forming of burial and sanitary customs the origin of shame, the link of that with covering up, are all explainable with a global thus ocean based aquatic theory!
in my view you are all correct but each in a limited section of the theory.
h.bos
Posted by: H.Bos | Oct 8, 2005 4:11:52 PM
Here is the physical evidence: Many of us have a bad back because our backs are NOT suppose to support all our weight on land, many women have recurrant urinary tract infections and yeast infections because of their proximity to bacteria from the anus, If we were in the water this would not happen. Also, these openings are too close because they're all moving forward; to the front were they would be if we were aquatic. We have locking kneecaps not for standing, but for swimming, ask any competitive swimmer. We get flat feet because they're actually paddles, and not made to support all that weight. Look at our physical structure (and physical problems) for answers.
Posted by: Judy heenan | Apr 18, 2006 11:58:18 PM
Nice to see AAT discussed here, but unfortunately we find a lot of irrelevant, incorrect or outdated "comments".
For recent views & discussions of AAT (sea/lake/riverside adaptations of human ancestors after the human/chimp divergence c.5 Ma) please see
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT
http://users.ugent.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm or google "aquarboreal"
Posted by: Marc Verhaegen | Jan 10, 2008 3:46:03 PM
